Exciting New Law Changes in the NRC

NRC

The Australian Rugby Union has confirmed a raft of exciting law changes ahead of the start of the NRC which aim to improve the game for spectators;

[adsenseyu1]

Competition and Law ChangesNotes
Reduce penalty goal and drop goal value to two points; and increase conversion goal value to three points• Most requested variation during idea submission stage of NRC Law variation process
• Places greater value on try scoring
• Already trialled in South Africa’s Varsity Cup
• Referees to be strong with cynical or repeated infringements
Instead of four try bonus point system, the winning team is awarded a bonus point for finishing three or more tries ahead of their opponents• Maintains ‘reward for risk’ aspect of matches for full 80 mins
• Currently used in France and in the ARU’s Junior Gold Cup
Pre-2013 TMO protocol to be used (i.e. for try scoring and in-goal situations only)• Reduces time wasted on referrals by limiting what can be referred

 [adsenseyu4]

Referee Interpretation ChangesNotes
If non-throwing team does not contest for the ball near where the ball is thrown, the referee may apply material effect and play on if the throw is not straight• Voted #1 variation by the public
• Designed to encourage every line-out to be genuinely contested
• Even if not straight, the ball must be caught within the line of the outside shoulder – i.e. the ball may not be deliberately thrown not straight
After time expires at half-time and full-time, if awarded a penalty kick, player can kick to touch and play the lineout• Voted #2 variation by the public
• The referee is the sole judge of time
• Allows a non-offending team all the options they are normally entitled to, and eliminates a negative tactic that can spoil the finish to a match
Reduced time limits down to 45 seconds for a penalty goal and 60 seconds for a conversion• Reduces time wasting
• Currently at 90 sec for conversions and 60 sec for penalty goals and is loosely monitored
Manage a time limit (30 seconds) to set a scrum• Reduces time wasting
• 30 seconds to start from when referee makes mark
• Allowance will be made for genuine injuries
• Ability to move scrum away from a minor injury to continue play
Defending half-back cannot enter area (“pocket”) between flanker and number 8 at scrum• Assists with continuous play
• Allows for dominant scrum and halfback to exert some pressure, but the halfback must not contact the scrum at any stage
Increased latitude in the area where quick taps can be taken at a penalty or free kick• Any tap must be taken from behind the mark, some leeway given on width
• All scrum penalty and free kicks must be taken by or in line with the number eight
More focus on applying Laws once maul formed• Aims to discourage the “hold up tackle” by ensuring that once defending players hold a ball carrier up and create a maul, they don’t then immediately collapse the maul to engineer a turnover
Quick throw-ins allowed even if touched by another player or person; must be same ball• Frees teams from a technicality that will allow for quicker play.
• If support staff or reserves deliberately touch the ball, a penalty kick is awarded 15m in.

[adsenseyu1]

What do you make of the new law changes for the NRC?

Feel Free to ShareShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Comments

comments

7 comments

  1. Poorest Decision to Change the Drop and Penalty Values!! Absolute rubbish! Teams to get more cynical Knowing they’d only give Two Points!! Four Cynical Infringements to One converted try? Sh*t call!!

    • northern hemisphere ^?

    • What a flog! penalties are destroying the game, no-one wants to watch kicking for 80 minutes

      • The penalty and what it’s worth should reflect the infringement that was made in the first place; while I don’t want to see a kicking game for 80 minutes either, I think the game would get a whole lot dirtier and less fun to watch with teams giving penalties away whenever it suits them.
        I wouldn’t mind drop goals being brought down to two, but four (converted) fouls being worth less than a converted try is rubbish

        • 1. “• Referees to be strong with cynical or repeated infringements” – still not worth it if you have to spend 10 minutes in the bin.
          2. Four converted fouls would EQUAL a converted try. 4 x 2 = 8, 5 + 3 = 8. Great maths mate.

          Making tries worth more would mean teams put a greater importance in scoring them, and in general we’ll have more interesting games. I think it’s great.

          Although, maybe keep drop goals at 3 seeing as they’re harder to score than penalties?

          • Haha shit, no idea where my maths was! -_-

            I like the Sound of stronger refereeing but how does that work when One of the more recent complaints was about too many cards ruining the Game? (I don’t see a problem with Heaps of yellows maybe but?)

            I’m all for more Running rugby, Maybe a bump up on yellow cards as well as the Decrease to Two Point Penalties could work… i like what youre saying

            Sure! Drop Goals for three! I just Remember New Zealand Having a big cry about it when the Steyns let rip from anywhere within 60m haha

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *